HERE IS SOME FOOD FOR THOUGHT WHEN WRITING YOUR NEXT APPLICATION:
Typical Reviewer Comments About Strong SBIR/STTR Applications:
• This project addresses an important need in improving human health.
• This project offers significant advantages over existing methods.
• Test of feasibility are clear.
• The applicant has addressed the concerns raised in the previous review.
• It is clear from the preliminary data that there is a high probability of success.
Typical Reviewer Comments About Weak SBIR/STTR Applications:
• Significance is not clear.
• Experimental details are lacking.
• Tests of feasibility are not clear.
• The team lacks experience in the field.
• The rationale for the stated experiments is not clear.
For more tips on this subject, click on this link : High Level SBIR/STTR Grant Writing Techniques.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or go to SBIR-STTRgrantshelp.com.
[ add comment ] | permalink |
( 3.2 / 58 )
Calendar
