Reviewer Comments 
www.SBIR-STTRgrantshelp.com.

HERE IS SOME FOOD FOR THOUGHT WHEN WRITING YOUR NEXT APPLICATION:

Typical Reviewer Comments About Strong SBIR/STTR Applications:
This project addresses an important need in improving human health.
This project offers significant advantages over existing methods.
Test of feasibility are clear.
The applicant has addressed the concerns raised in the previous review.
It is clear from the preliminary data that there is a high probability of success.

Typical Reviewer Comments About Weak SBIR/STTR Applications:

Significance is not clear.
Experimental details are lacking.
Tests of feasibility are not clear.
The team lacks experience in the field.
The rationale for the stated experiments is not clear.

For more tips on this subject, click on this link : High Level SBIR/STTR Grant Writing Techniques.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or go to SBIR-STTRgrantshelp.com.



[ add comment ] ( 1659 views )   |  permalink  |   ( 3 / 2048 )

<<First <Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next> Last>>